Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Terence Atmane vs David Goffin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Atmane vs Goffin analysis and find out who is favored!
Terence Atmane vs David Goffin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Atmane has won 48.54% of points on his second serve, while Goffin has won 53.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Atmane, in recent form, has won 46.71% of his opponent's second serve points, while Goffin has won 51.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.75% and 30.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Atmane has saved 66.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Goffin has saved 56.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Atmane has won 62.79% of matches played (W/L 54/ 32), with Goffin winning 56.34% (W/L 40/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Atmane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 141/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9). Goffin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 210/ 111), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 37/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Atmane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70.21% of matches (W/L 33/ 14), where as Goffin has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 20/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Atmane winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Atmane winning 2 and Goffin winning 1. The last match between Atmane and Goffin was at the Phoenix Challenger, 12-03-2024, Q3, Hard with Terence Atmane getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:31.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Atmane and Goffin have played a deciding set 1 times, with Atmane winning 1 times and Goffin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Atmane winning 0, and Goffin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Atmane has played against opponents with an average rank of 229.9 while Goffin has played against players with an average rank of 273.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Atmane has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Goffin has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Atmane has converted 43.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Goffin has converted 40.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Atmane 1 - 0 Goffin
137
Rank
127
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
114
Rank
7
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
63% (183-106)
Career Total W/L
63% (621-364)
56% (18-14)
YTD W/L
58% (18-13)
$295,550
Career Prize Money
$10,394,265
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Terence Atmane | David Goffin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:31 | 1:47:31 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (48/78) | 55% (42/76) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (37/48) | 67% (28/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 37% (11/30) | 50% (17/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (31/76) | 38% (30/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Terence Atmane
Player
David Goffin
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
8
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Terence Atmane | David Goffin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (18/14) | 58% (18/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (41/36) | 55% (43/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (367/371) | 51% (399/381) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 64% (9/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 60% (6/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.55 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 200 | 129 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 126 | 69 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:55 | 1:57:32 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 174.97 | 213.74 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1409/2400) | 60% (1445/2409) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (1015/1409) | 70% (1016/1445) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (481/991) | 54% (517/964) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (76/176) | 41% (100/243) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (782/2208) | 39% (969/2495) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 56% (5/4) | 43% (3/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 45% (5/6) | 67% (8/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (5/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (18/30) | 60% (18/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 54% (7/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 57% (8/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 87% (15/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 31% (16/5) |
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Terence Atmane
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
46
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Christopher Eubanks
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Harold Mayot
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Terence Atmane
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Terence Atmane
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Billy Harris
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
David Goffin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
David Goffin
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
David Goffin
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
David Goffin
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
36 of
44)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
David Goffin
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Benjamin Hassan
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
10
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Calvin Hemery
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
David Goffin
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
David Goffin
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
8
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Atmane Vs Goffin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For David Goffin
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
